May 9, 2014

New Position on Intellectual Property

Please see below for an announcement from Dr. Foley, Senior Vice Chancellor for Research and Graduate Studies. Related policy and procedure documents and forms will be posted to the OSPA website shortly.

The next campus Grant Connections meeting is scheduled for Wednesday, May 21, at 11:00am in the Bond Life Sciences Center (Room 171). If you have questions, please submit them to me between now and then in anticipation of a Q&A session specific to this topic. Of course questions and conversation on the day of the meeting are most welcome, too.  



Please see below and attached and please distribute to the faculty in your colleges.  The form referenced in the letter below is included in the attachment above.  Thank you. 

May 8, 2014

Dear Colleagues,
Today we announce a change in the University’s position regarding intellectual property (IP) that could result from industry-funded research. For the last thirty years, the University of Missouri, like other universities, has taken the stance of avidly guarding the ultimate ownership of IP that might be generated in the course of an industry-funded project. Analysis shows that much less IP is generated in such projects when compared to projects that are funded by other sources, especially federal agencies. Experience also teaches that, in many such cases, faculty prefer to have the funding in hand rather than to lose funding due to failed negotiations over potential IP that may not come to fruition. Funding to support students, postdoctoral fellows, laboratory expenses, and faculty effort has a real and present value that goes to the core of the University’s missions in education and research. This present value is often worth more than the hypothetical value of IP that is as yet not created and may never be created.
With this in mind, the University will relax its stance on the disposition of potential IP from industry-funded research. We will empower faculty to guide the University in making such decisions. I very much hope that this position will lead to smoother negotiations, faster response times from my office, and shorter contracts.
The University will continue to preserve publications rights and the ongoing use of your work for future research; we will not warrant our research under any circumstances. Publication rights and other key contract terms can sometimes be problematic with certain companies, and when they are, negotiation times inevitability increase. However, with the obstacle of potential IP ownership off the table, usually these other issues do not arise with reputable companies.
When the investigator and University give up IP rights, an additional five percent (5%) F&A will be assessed on those line items of the budget that can be charged F&A. This is a typical practice utilized to close the gap between a university’s nominal facilities and administrative (F&A) rate and actual F&A costs. Experience teaches that most companies are willing to pay this small extra increment for rights to IP.
So how will this work?  We do have to add a form in order to implement this process, and that form is attached for you to peruse. When you fill out this form, it will indicate to staff in OSPA and OTMIR how you wish to proceed. You now have three options:
  • If you, the faculty member, do not want to protect your rights as an inventor and you do not want the University to negotiate for ownership of any invention that may result from the work, then you should indicate such on the form, and we will not negotiate for the ownership of IP. You might decide to choose this option when you are doing fundamental research and when you are seeking to develop a relationship with researchers at the company.

  • If, on the other hand, you, the faculty member, do indeed want to protect your rights as an inventor and you do want the University to negotiate for ownership of any invention that may result from the work, then we will do that for you. This may be a good stance to take if you are working in an area of high, applied impact that may produce an invention or inventions of value.

  • If you, the faculty member, are just not sure of which you want to do, then you should call the Office of Technology Management and Industry Relations (OTMIR) to have a discussion of the matter. They will walk you through the issues and help you find answers for your particular case.

Let’s also be clear on some other issues: We cannot and will not relax our stance on ownership of IP on federally-funded research. Federally-funded research is governed by the Bayh-Dole Act, which has had a hugely positive effect on innovation in this country. Also, if the company is passing through federal funds to the University, we have to treat that funding as if it came directly from the federal agency (though the company may argue otherwise). Thus, we cannot relinquish control of IP ownership.
I hope that this will smooth the flow of funding to those faculty who seek to work with industry and that the new approach will lead to better industry-university relations in the present and future.
Sincerely,




Henry C. Foley, Ph.D.
Senior Vice Chancellor for
Research and Graduate Studies.